From January to February 2011, the world watched as a wave of peaceful, organized protests swept through Egypt, ending the nearly 30-year dictatorship of former President Hosni Mubarak. In Bleeding Hearts, Hendawy seeks answers to the question: why did some peaceful advocates of change switch tactics and later adopt violence? He eschews the terms terrorism and extremism because of their ambiguity and frequent misuse by Middle Eastern governments, preferring the simplicity of “violent insurgents” (p. 53), and offers ethnographic profiles of various insurgents who peacefully protested in 2011 but changed tactics by 2013. Hendawy argues that their radicalization was the result of government-sponsored torture, marked by its penchant for humiliation. As he elaborates, “the combination of trauma, guilt, anger, and despondency put these individuals in a trigger state … [that] comprised the perfect storm … to resolve unsettled grievances" (p. 77). Although the author's sample is relatively small, it is backed by more substantial secondary literature on radicalization and Egypt generally. Recommended. General readers through faculty; professionals.
— Choice Reviews
In Egypt, during ‘Arab Spring’ 2011, pro-democracy activists committed to non-violent tactics filled Tahrir Square for the eighteen days that culminated in the overthrow of an autocratic president who had ruled the country for thirty years. How do we explain the sudden shift in allegiance among many of these very activists who subsequently joined the ranks of the violent movement against the state? In Bleeding Hearts, Abdallah Hendawy, a pro-democracy activist in Egypt at the time and since a trained sociologist and scholar, offers a most insightful and compelling explanation of this transformation. Based on his own fieldwork and engaging interviews with those who resorted to violence , there is no better introduction to this topic. Bleeding Hearts is essential reading for scholars, activists, policymakers, and anyone who wants to understand the fine line we all tread between democracy and autocracy.
— John Dale, George Mason University